Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease that disrupts the flow of information in the central nervous system (CNS), which affects the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves in individuals with MS. A triggering event causes the individual's immune system to attack the CNS, resulting in damage to the outer protective layer, called myelin, of the CNS system. This results in unpredictable disruptions in the flow of signals from the brain to the body along the CNS pathways. Some common symptoms are fatigue, numbness/tingling, pain, paralysis, mood changes, and memory problems. A 2019 study found that nearly 1 million people in the United States are living with MS. The exact cause of MS is not known. Most individuals who are diagnosed with MS are between 20 and 50 years old, and most are female. Each individual with MS experiences the disease differently, but there are four basic types of MS: clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS), and secondary progressive MS (SPMS).
CIS is the first episode of neurological symptoms, which lasts for at least 24 hours, in an individual. The episode does not meet the diagnosis of MS because the individual who experiences CIS may not go on to develop MS. If CIS is accompanied with identifiable CNS lesions on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, it is more likely that the individual will later be diagnosed with MS. There are some therapies approved for CIS that can delay the onset of MS.
RRMS is the most common course of the disease in individuals diagnosed with MS. This disease course type is characterized by clearly defined exacerbations (relapses) of new or increasing neurological symptoms that are followed by periods of complete or partial recovery (remissions). The disease may be active (with or without MRI activity) or not active, and the symptoms may worsen or not worsen during each episode.
PPMS is the course of MS characterized by the lack of early relapses or remissions as the neurological functioning worsens. PPMS can be further classified as active (with or without MRI activity) or not active, as well as with progression or without progression. The individual may have brief periods of stable disease as well as periods of increasing disability with or without new relapses or MRI activity.
SPMS is the progression of MS after a time of RRMS. Some individuals with RRMS will transition to SPMS. This course of the disease is characterized by a progressive worsening of CMS function, with the accumulation of disability, over time. This course of the disease can also be further classified as active (with or without MRI activity) or not active, as well as with progression or without progression. During this course of the disease, the individual may still occasionally experience relapses as well as times of stable disease.
Ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) is a recombinant chimeric monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 antibody directed against cluster of differentiation (CD)20-expressing B cells. The precise mechanism by which ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) exerts its therapeutic effects in MS is unknown, but is presumed to involve binding to CD20, a cell surface antigen present on pre-B and mature B lymphocytes. Following cell-surface binding to B lymphocytes, ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) results in cell lysis through mechanisms including antibody-dependent cellular cytolysis and complement-dependent cytolysis.
The safety and efficacy of ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) was evaluated in two identical, simultaneously run clinical trials: NCT03277261 (ULTIMATE 1) and NCT03277248 (ULTIMATE 2). The clinical trials were phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, active-controlled studies comparing individuals who received intravenous (IV) ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) and oral placebo versus individuals who received IV placebo and oral teriflunomide (Aubagio). The primary endpoint was the annualized relapse rate (ARR). Some secondary endpoints included total number of gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesions per MRI scan, total number of new and enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions per MRI scan, and time to confirmed disability progression (CDP) for at least 12 weeks.
In ULTIMATE 1, 271 individuals were randomly assigned to receive ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) and 274 individuals received teriflunomide (Aubagio). The ARR for the ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) cohort was 0.076 versus 0.188 for the teriflunomide (Aubagio) cohort, which represented a 59 percent relative reduction rate (P<0.001). The mean number of T1 Gd-enhancing lesions in the ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) cohort was 0.016 versus 0.491 for the teriflunomide (Aubagio) cohort, which represented a 97 percent relative reduction rate (P<0.001). The mean number of new or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions for the ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) cohort was 0.213 versus 2.789 for the teriflunomide (Aubagio) cohort, which represented a 92 percent relative reduction rate (P<0.001).
In ULTIMATE 2, 272 individuals were randomly assigned to receive ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) and 272 individuals received teriflunomide (Aubagio). The ARR for the ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) cohort was 0.091 versus 0.178 for the teriflunomide (Aubagio) cohort, which represented a 49 percent relative reduction rate (P=0.002). The mean number of T1 Gd-enhancing lesions in the ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) cohort was 0.009 versus 0.250 for the teriflunomide (Aubagio) cohort, which represented a 97 percent relative reduction rate (P<0.001). The mean number of new or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions for the ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) cohort was 0.282 versus 2.831 for the teriflunomide (Aubagio) cohort, which represented a 90 percent relative reduction rate (P<0.001). The proportion of individuals with 12-week CDP risk reduction (pooled analysis between ULTIMATE 1 and ULTIMATE 2) was 5.2 percent for the ublituximab-xiiy (Briumvi) cohort versus 5.9 percent for the teriflunomide (Aubagio) cohort, which was an insignificant change (16 percent; P=0.510).
OFF-LABEL INDICATION
There may be additional indications contained in the Policy section of this document due to evaluation of criteria highlighted in the Company's off-label policy, and/or review of clinical guidelines issued by leading professional organizations and government entities.